Paolo Donadeo — LifeLOG

The world of information technology is made by men and, like any other activity in which human beings are involved in, mistakes happens. Sometimes huge mistakes. And huge mistakes turn out into disgraces. One of these disgraces has a name: PHP.

Here is the story: some days ago wordpress.org released the latest version and I decided to upgrade. No db changes, everything seems ok. But, wait a moment… the sidebar is broken! To be honest, the page itself seems to be broken. I did nothing strange. Ok, let’s rationalize this: ssh on the server, cd to the wordpress directory and issue:

$ php index.php
Segmentation fault

What the frack?!? I had no time to investigate more, and I decided to install the most recent working backup (I use GIT to track everything, including db backups) and forgot it for some days. Tonight I decided to solve the problem. I installed everything on my PC and, by hacking the DB, I was able to remove all the sidebar widgets, among which I suspected the guilty should be. Than, from Wordpress admin I added exactly the same widgets, in the very same order and with the same configuration.

Result? No more segfault.

Now, how can a so popular application be so fragile? Are Wordpress guys stupid, or what? No, this time the problem is with the technology. One word suffices: PHP.

Yes, I know, I perfectly know I shouldn’t focus myself on this or that technology, I now Facebook is made with PHP, I know everything, but… as an engineer I simply can’t ignore how poor this language is!

Hey, if I considered the language choice unimportant I should work in the marketing

End of this rant: I started my own blog, I’ll write it in a real programming languages, Objective Caml, I’ll never be rich but at least I’ll never ever spend 3 hours of my life debugging a PHP buggy blog.

Summary of the previous episodes: 10 days ago Richard Jones complained about the difficulties to achieve simple tasks (drawing a function graph on the screen) on modern computers with modern programming languages; the day after Erik de Castro Lopo replied with a post in which he used GTK and Cairo (better: the OCaml bindings) to achieve the result to draw a simple function on the screen. Yesterday Matias Giovannini added some pepper to this argument using SDL to draw the Newton fractal.

So, what can be added to all this? With a perfect graphic toy you can draw on a window with simple commands, of course, but you also want to interact with the objects you drew. So I elaborated Erik example to add some keyboard and mouse interaction with the graphics on the screen. Read the rest of this entry »

Motivation

Last week I was writing a Python script to make an automatic backup, and I decided to send me an email in case of scp failure. I decided to use Python to send the email, possibly via GMail and I found this interesting blog post: Sending emails via Gmail with Python. I like Python, it’s a good programming language, but my heart (as a developer!) beats for the Objective Caml programming language.

So I decided to port the script presented in the post in OCaml. The result is this sendmail.ml.

Compiling the script

To compile the script you need four software components:

1. the Objective Caml environment. You can download it from the INRIA site;
2. Findlib, to make compiling very simple;
3. Ocamlnet: here is the home page of the project;
4. OCaml binding to the SSL library.

You can of course compile all this stuff, but every decent Linux distributions has all packaged. In Debian you have to run the following command:

# aptitude install ocaml libocamlnet-ocaml-dev \
  libssl-ocaml-dev ocaml-findlib

Now, to compile the script, issue the command:

$ ocamlfind ocamlopt -linkpkg -package \
  netstring,smtp,ssl,str sendmail.ml -o sendmail

Before using it, remember to customize your name, email address, GMail user and password.

Code comparison

The first difference that jumps out at everyone confronting the two scripts is the number of lines: 41 lines for Python against 163 of my OCaml version. The difference is justified by the fact that the Python standard library comes with an almost full featured SMTP client, with ESMTP and TLS capability. On the other side Objective Caml has a very concise standard library, which includes essential modules and data structures, but no “batteries” are provided out of the box. This is a precise design decision by INRIA and, in some ways, I agree with them. Luckily the OCaml community is a source of excellent libraries and bindings, like Ocamlnet by Gerd Stolpmann and the SSL library binding, written by Samuel Mimram. The first one is in particular the Swiss Army Knife for network oriented battles.

Since the SMTP client provided by Ocamlnet doesn’t include TLS capability I decided to stole the source code and adapt it to my needs, to have a more comfortable and high level interface resembling the one offered by the Python standard library.

So the different length is easily explained: 109 lines of code are devoted to the smtp_client class, and the actual script is 54 lines long.

The forward pipe operator

All Turing complete computer languages are equivalent, but everyone knows this is only the theory and everyone have a programming language of choice. Here are two examples of what you can do in OCaml.

The first is the pipe operator:

let (|>) x f = f x

Here we define a (very common in FP) infix operator which simply inverts the order of its operands. What the frack is this? Very simple, we use it to invert the order of a function with its last parameter so, if we want to compute the 3rd Fibonacci number we can write:

let fib3 = fibonacci 3

but also:

let fib3 = 3 |> fibonacci

This is not a style issue, we can define a simple infix operator that feeds a function with a value; we can of course connect several functions together, like in a shell script with the Unix pipe operator, transforming an ugly and difficult to be read call:

let result = func1(func2 (func3(x)))

into:

let result = x |> func3 |> func2 |> func1

In the sendmail.ml script, line 127, we read:

email_string |>
  Str.global_replace new_line_regexp "\r\n" |>
    Str.split crlf_regexp |>
      List.iter (fun s ->
        self#output_string (if String.length s > 0 && s.[0] = '.' then
                              ("." ^ s ^ "\r\n")
                            else s^"\r\n"));

Here we take the string containing the email, we replace all new lines with the sequence “\r\n”, split the stream into lines and in the end send each line to the SMTP server, taking care of quoting each line starting with a period. In 6 lines of code.

Algebraic data type

Algebraic data type are a very interesting aspect of functional programming. We can easily wrap two heterogeneous data types into a single one with two line of code:

type socket =
  | Unix_socket of Unix.file_descr
  | SSL_socket of Ssl.socket

The smtp_client class contains a reference to the connection handle used for communicating with the server which is a plain file descriptor or an SSL socket, which one depends on the state of the communication. I do not want to create a virtual class or an interface and two implementing class as I should do in horrible languages like Java, spending half an hour deciding which methods to put in the public interface, and so on; after all, it’s only a file descriptor!

Now I have a new type which is a disjoint union of the two original types and I can write code like this (line 54):

let input = match channel with
  | Unix_socket s -> Unix.read s
  | SSL_socket s -> Ssl.read s in

Here we say: if channel is actually a Unix file descriptor, let’s define a new function “input” which is the standard function “read”, from Unix module, otherwise, if channel is an SSL socket, let’s define “input” as the Ssl.read function, which works only in ciphered sockets. From now on I’ll use input instead of one of the two original functions.

Ok, it’s time to stop the waffle. Enjoy the script if you need, it’s completely free, like in free beer, in free speech and even in free sex!